Friday Board Review

Internal Medicine Board Review with Dr. Edward Guo

A 60 year old male with a history of poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia presents for right foot pain. He noticed a few weeks ago that he developed a wound on the sole of his right foot which hurts with pressure. He denies any injury to the area or fevers. Vitals are within normal limits. Exam is notable for a shallow based ulcer with clean margins and no active drainage on the sole of his right foot. Which of the following positive physical exam findings, laboratory test, or imaging study has the highest positive likelihood ratio for osteomyelitis in this patient?

A: ESR > 70

B: MRI

C: probing to bone

D: ulcer area > 2 cm2

Answer: ESR > 70

This patient is presenting with a diabetic foot ulcer, a common complication of poorly controlled diabetes. While many physical exam features such as fever, pain, or purulence may be suggestive of osteomyelitis, an accurate diagnosis remains a challenge especially with co-existing diabetic neuropathy and blunted immune responses from diabetes. Although it is a non-specific marker of inflammation, an ESR > 70 mm/h has the highest likelihood ratio of osteomyelitis compared to other exam, laboratory, and imaging investigations as shown in the table below. This emphasizes the sensitivity and diagnostic utility of obtaining an ESR level in the emergency department to investigate for osteomyelitis in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. The gold standard test to diagnose osteomyelitis is a bone biopsy.

Positive FindingPositive LR (95% CI)Negative LR (95% CI)
Ulcer area > 2 cm²7.2 (1.1 – 49)0.48 (0.31 – 0.76)
“Probe to bone”6.4 (3.6 – 11)0.39 (0.20 – 0.76)
ESR > 70 mm/h11 (1.6 – 79)0.34 (0.06 – 1.90)
Plain radiograph2.3 (1.6 – 3.3)0.63 (0.51 – 0.78)
MRI3.8 (2.5 – 5.8)0.14 (0.08 – 0.26)
Table adapted from Tintinalli’s Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, 9e Table 224-2

References:

Jalili M, Niroomand M. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. In: Tintinalli JE, Ma O, Yealy DM, Meckler GD, Stapczynski J, Cline DM, Thomas SH. eds. Tintinalli’s Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, 9e. McGraw Hill; 2020.

Mandell  JC, Khurana  B, Smith  JT, Czuczman  GJ, Ghazikhanian  V, Smith  SE: Osteomyelitis of the lower extremity: pathophysiology, imaging, and classification, with an emphasis on diabetic foot infection. Emerg Radiol 2017 Oct 20. doi: 10.1007/s10140-017-1564-9. [Epub ahead of print] [PubMed: 29058098]

Wednesday Image Review

What’s the Diagnosis? By Dr. Austin Redilla

A 60 year old woman with a past medical history of HTN, HLD, and recent TIA now on Aspirin and Eliquis presents to the ED with one month of crampy, intermittent abdominal pain. She describes feeling sharp cramps in the epigastric region which typically last a couple of minutes and then resolve on their own. She cannot recall any exacerbating or relieving factors. She does not have any associated nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or dysuria. She is currently without pain. On exam, her abdomen is non-tender without any rebound or guarding. POCUS findings are as below. What’s the diagnosis?

Answer: Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm with impending rupture

  • The aorta can be visualized with the curvilinear probe and is found lying just anterior to the spine. AAA is defined as an aorta >3cm in diameter; repair is considered with diameter >5cm or in symptomatic patients. Smoking is the greatest risk factor, increasing chances 4x compared to lifetime non-smokers. Other risk factors include family member with AAA, male sex, and age >601.
  • Physical exam is only 29% sensitive for aortic diameter 3.0 – 3.9cm, 50% for 4.0 – 4.9cm, and 76% for greater than 5.0cm2. This patient did have a palpable abdominal pulsation with deep pressure. Tenderness is associated with unstable AAA, though lack of pain does not rule this out.
  • Bedside US dramatically increases sensitivity to >90% for diagnosing and measuring AAAs of all sizes3. Measurements should be taken from the outside wall to outside wall in transverse and longitudinal views. This patient’s aorta was measured to be >5cm and had concerning signs of thickened walls.
  • CTA is the gold standard for diagnosis and measurement in stable patients. This patient had findings of extension of luminal contrast beyond the expected aortic wall and calcifications, which was concerning for impending rupture4. The patient was evaluated by vascular surgery and taken Level 1 to the OR for emergent open aortic repair.

References:

  1. Tintinalli’s Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, 9th Edition. Prince, L. Johnson, G. Chapter 60. Page 416. McGraw Hill Professional, 15 Nov. 2023.
  2. Lederle FA, Simel DL: The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have abdominal aortic aneurysm? JAMA 281: 77, 1999. [PMID: 9892455]
  3. American College of Emergency Physicians: Emergency ultrasound imaging criteria compendium. Ann Emerg Med 48: 487, 2006. [PMID: 16997700]
  4. Vu KN, Kaitoukov Y, Morin-Roy F, Kauffmann C, Giroux MF, Thérasse E, Soulez G, Tang A. Rupture signs on computed tomography, treatment, and outcome of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Insights Imaging. 2014 Jun;5(3):281-93. doi: 10.1007/s13244-014-0327-3. Epub 2014 May 1. PMID: 24789068; PMCID: PMC4035490.
Tuesday Advanced Cases & Procedure Pearls

From the Archives: Acute Generalized Weakness by Dr. Aimee Parks

Case: A 35 year old Hispanic male presents to the Emergency Department for acute onset weakness, particularly in the bilateral upper and lower extremities. Symptoms started abruptly last night after a stressful work day. He denies any recent illnesses, insect bites, or rashes. Vitals are within normal limits. On exam, there is pronounced weakness in his proximal muscles with his lower extremities slightly weaker than his upper extremities. His grip strength is preserved. Reflexes are normal.

Differential diagnosis includes: thyrotoxic periodic paralysis, hypokalemic periodic paralysis, myasthenic crisis, Guillain-Barre syndrome, transverse myelitis, tick paralysis

Case continued: Labs are notable for a potassium 1.7, magnesium 1.5, TSH < 0.01, Free T4 5.9, Free T3 23.5. EKG showing sinus rhythm with prolonged QTc. Management included IV and PO repletion of potassium which improved the patient’s symptoms rapidly. He was also started on methimazole for hyperthyroidism. Finally, he was admitted to a telemetry monitored bed to check serial BMPs and monitor for rebound hyperkalemia.

Teaching Pearls:

  • Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis is a form of acquired hypokalemic periodic paralysis, often precipitated by rest after strenuous exercise or high carbohydrate load.
  • Treat with potassium repletion, continuous cardiac monitoring, and monitor potassium levels for rebound hyperkalemia.
  • For acute weakness episodes not responsive to potassium replacement, use Propranolol.
  • Treat hyperthyroidism – attacks should cease with euthyroid state.

References:
Chaudhry MA, Wayangankar S. Thryotoxic Periodic Paralysis: A concise review of the literature. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2016;12(3):190-194.

Kung AW. Clinical review: Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis: a diagnostic challenge. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006 Jul;91(7):2490-5. Epub 2006 Apr 11.

Vijayaumar A, Ashwath G, Thimmappa D. Thyrotoxic periodic paralysis: clinical challenges. J Thyroid Res 2014;2014:649502

Monday Back to Basics & Pharmacology

Let’s talk about Rehab with Dr. Katie Selman

Many facilities may have multiple services – often, the same facility will offer subacute rehab and long-term care and memory care services

Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs) = managing house, finances, transport, medications, shopping

Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) = walking, toileting, bathing, feeding, transferring

  • Is this a rehab-able condition?
    • Rehab-able condition examples: stroke, hip fracture, deconditioning after serious illness
    • Potentially not rehab-able examples: any progressive, gradual degenerative disease in which the patient is expected to continue to decline
  • Why does this matter?
    • Insurance will stop paying for rehab if patient is not improving or making progress based on their PT/OT/ST notes
    • There is a daily copay for patients after 21 days in rehab and the full cost is on the patient after 100 days
      • PT is amazing but cannot fully reverse a months-long decline in 21 days!
  • Will the patient be able to physically and cognitively participate in rehab?
    • Acute inpatient rehab = 3 hours therapy/day
    • Subacute rehab = 3 hours/week
  • Patients are not rehabbed until they can go home safely – patients are rehabbed until they can safely live in a one-story home.
    • So what is the goal after rehab? What is the backup plan if they still can’t go home after 21 days? Will they still need help?

References:

https://www.genworth.com/aging-and-you/finances/cost-of-care.html

https://www.medicare.gov/care-compare/

https://www.aarp.org/caregiving/

Flint LA, David DJ, Smith AK. Rehabbed to Death. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(5):408-409. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1809354

Flint LA, David D, Lynn J, Smith AK. Rehabbed to Death: Breaking the Cycle. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(11):2398-2401. doi:10.1111/jgs.16128

Burke RE, Jones J, Lawrence E, et al. Evaluating the Quality of Patient Decision-Making Regarding Post-Acute Care. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(5):678-684. doi:10.1007/s11606-017-4298-1

Halifax E, Bui NM, Hunt LJ, Stephens CE. Transitioning to Life in a Nursing Home: The Potential Role of Palliative Care. J Palliat Care. 2021 Jan;36(1):61-65. doi: 10.1177/0825859720904802. Epub 2020 Feb 27. PMID: 32106767; PMCID: PMC8127871. 

Friday Board Review

Internal Medicine Board Review with Dr. Edward Guo

A 30 year old female with a history of type 1 diabetes and past hospitalizations for diabetic ketoacidosis presents via EMS for altered mental status. History is limited as patient is altered and not answering questions appropriately. Vitals include Temp 100.4F, HR 116, BP 102/70, RR 30, SpO2 98% on room air. Exam shows an ill-appearing female with Kussmaul respirations and a non-focal neurologic exam. Labs are notable for 20K WBCs and serum glucose of 400. A lumbar puncture is performed to assess for meningitis. For this patient, which of the following CSF glucose values is within normal limits?

A: 60 mg/dL

B: 100 mg/dL

C: 260 mg/dL

D: 400 mg/dL

Answer: 260 mg/dL

This patient is presenting with signs and symptoms of diabetic ketoacidosis. While it is critical for the emergency physician to treat the hyperglycemia with volume resuscitation and insulin, it is also paramount to investigate for underlying causes such as infection. The glucose level in CSF is proportional to serum glucose values and should correspond to approximately 60-70% of serum glucose values. Thus, a CSF glucose value of 60 or 100 mg/dL in this patient is lower than expected and concerning for bacterial CNS infection. Higher than expected CSF glucose levels are non-specific and generally do not exceed 300 mg/dL.

References:

Lillian A. Mundt; Kristy Shanahan (2010). Graff’s Textbook of Routine Urinalysis and Body Fluids. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. p. 237. ISBN 978-1582558752.

Seehusen DA, Reeves MM, Fomin DA (September 2003). “Cerebrospinal fluid analysis”Am Fam Physician68 (6): 1103–8. PMID 14524396

Wednesday Image Review

What’s the Diagnosis? By Dr. Ethan Anderson

A 19 year old female with a past medical history of autism and anxiety presents with right lower extremity swelling and pain. Two weeks ago, she developed right lower back pain with radiation into her right hip and leg which she describes as sore. She is sexually active and was started on hormonal contraception 2-3 months ago. Vital signs include BP 117/75, HR 108, RR 18, SpO2 99% RA, T 97.5F. The patient’s right lower extremity is neurovascularly intact with tenderness to palpation and swelling without color change. A right lower extremity ultrasound is shown below. What’s the diagnosis? How is this ultrasound performed?

Answer: Right Common Femoral and Popliteal DVT

DVT Ultrasound Evaluation: must evaluate at least 2 regions, typically femoral and popliteal veins

Femoral Vein

  1. Most often performed using the linear probe (curvilinear probe may provide greater penetration for larger body habitus)
  2. Start just distal to the groin where the iliac vein becomes the common femoral vein
  3. Follow common femoral vein down to where the common femoral splits off into greater saphenous, femoral, and the deep femoral vein (approximately mid-thigh) and continue to follow the femoral vein until at least the mid-thigh, compressing in 1 cm increments to ensure compressibility of veins throughout

Popliteal Vein

  1. Place probe on posterior aspect of the knee and look for popliteal vein (superficial to popliteal artery)
  2. Follow popliteal vein and compress in 1 cm increments to ensure compressibility until the vein divides into the fibular, posterior tibial and anterior tibial veins

DVT Ultrasound Pearls:

  • A vein is compressible if the walls touch with compression – if you are pushing hard enough to compress the artery but not the vein, there is likely a DVT!
  • Evaluation of femoral and popliteal regions is crucial because a DVT within either of these veins is considered “proximal” and requires medical management with anticoagulants and further evaluation for iliac/IVC involvement or pulmonary embolism.
  • Clinical diagnosis of DVT is typically unreliable due to the infrequency of classic findings (edema, warmth, erythema, pain, and tenderness) which are only present in 23 to 50 percent of patients
  • Venogram remains the “gold standard” for the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. However, ultrasound is the most accurate non-invasive test to diagnose deep venous thrombosis.

This patient received prompt anticoagulation in the ED and after being admitted, received a CT venogram revealing acute deep vein thrombosis in the infrahepatic inferior vena cava, bilateral common iliac, bilateral external iliac, bilateral internal iliac and bilateral common femoral veins requiring percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy!

References:

Baker M, Anjum F, dela Cruz J. Deep Venous Thrombosis Ultrasound Evaluation. [Updated 2023 Aug 8]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan-.

https://sso.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-the-treatment-of-proximal-and-distal-lower-extremity-deep-vein-thrombosis-dvt?search=dvt%20management&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1#H5

https://coreultrasound.com/dvt/

Tuesday Advanced Cases & Procedure Pearls

DIC with Dr. Alyssa Sinko

Case: 64 M with no PMH presenting with continuous oozing from mass in posterior pharynx. Vital signs significant for: T 98.5, HR 72, BP 130/84, RR 16, SPO2 98%. Patient also found to have petechia on lower extremities. IV access established, and it is noted that there is bleeding from the IV sites.

Pathophysiology of DIC:

Causes of DIC:
– Most common: Sepsis
– Carcinomas, leukemias, TBI, pancreatitis, snake bites, ARDS, transfusion reactions, transplant rejection, crush injuries, burns, fat embolism, liver disease
– Pregnancy associated: Placental Abruption, Amniotic Fluid Embolism, Septic Abortion, HELLP syndrome, Acute fatty liver of pregnancy

Laboratory Testing:

PT used for monitoring over course

Bleeding Differential Diagnosis:

Management:
– Treat to treat underlying trigger
– If purpura fulminans present, treat with protein C concentrate
– Consider heparin if thrombosis is primary symptom
– Repletion to be considered if significant bleeding or impending procedure

  • Fibrinogen < 100 = Cryoprecipitate
  • Platelets <50K with bleeding, <10K without bleeding = Platelets
  • PT/PTT over 1.5x normal limit = FFP
  • Vitamin K and Folate

References:

Tintinalli’s Emergency Medicine Manual, 8e Eds. Rita K. Cydulka, et al. McGraw Hill, 2018

Uptodate.com